The Sony A6600 and the Fujifilm X-T3 could seem like utterly several types of cameras, however every is a high-end mirrorless mannequin focusing on lovers and professionals. The Fujifilm options one of many best-looking, best-handling designs of any fashionable digicam, whereas the Sony is loaded with superior expertise. This comparability will enable you resolve which is strategy works higher for you.

Sony introduced the A6600 in August 2019 and it’ll ship in November. It’s an improve to 2016’s A6500, and though not a lot has modified by way of specs, there’s nonetheless sufficient going for this digicam to get individuals excited. The X-T3 is Fujifilm’s flagship crop-sensor digicam (a title it shares with the X-H1 and new X-Pro3). It might be a 12 months outdated, but it surely nonetheless compares favorably to the Sony in lots of respects.

Sensor

Each cameras include an APS-C sensor with a 1.5X crop issue in comparison with full body. The X-T3 often is the older digicam, but it surely truly has the newer sensor, with 26 megapixels in comparison with the A6600’s 24. This distinction in decision has little real-world impact and shouldn’t influence your choice.

The X-T3’s sensor is backside-illuminated, which helps it gather extra gentle, and makes use of Fujifilm’s distinctive X-TRANS pixel array which helps management moiré while not having an anti-aliasing filter. Sony, alternatively, has chosen to make use of a skinny wiring layer and enormous photodiode substrate, which additionally makes it extra environment friendly at gathering gentle, whereas sticking to the standard Bayer pixel sample. In observe, each sensors carry out admirably.

The Fujifilm has a local ISO vary of 160 by way of 12,800. Compared, the A6600 has a local ISO vary of 100 by way of to six,400. Taking pictures in RAW, each supply loads of flexibility for enhancing and getting the look you need. Each additionally supply nice picture high quality straight out of digicam when capturing JPEG, one thing Sony has labored exhausting to enhance within the A6600. But when we needed to choose a winner, we nonetheless choose the gorgeous coloration copy of Fujifilm’s movie simulations in its JPEGs.

Autofocus

For the previous few years no less than, Sony has pushed the boundaries of autofocus efficiency. The A6500 comes with 425 phase- and contrast-detection factors, masking 84% of the sensor. The X-T3 makes use of 117 factors — nevertheless, they are often additional cut up up into 425 factors and canopy 90% of the sensor. Sony does have the quicker AF, nevertheless, down to only 0.02 seconds in splendid situations. No different model in the marketplace claims to match that.

Each techniques are constructed with face and eye detection and produce nice outcomes for when photographing each nonetheless and shifting topics. The A6500, nevertheless, makes use of Sony’s newest Actual-Time Monitoring and Actual-Time Eye AF applied sciences, which have been constructed on synthetic intelligence and take AF efficiency to the subsequent stage. Actual-Time Eye AF additionally works on animals, making it an incredible possibility for wildlife photographers.

Each techniques have fast and dependable AF, however Sony takes the win right here.

Construct high quality and design

The X-T3 and the A6600 can each be described as compact, light-weight mirrorless cameras, however they appear strikingly completely different. The Fujifilm X-Sequence has lengthy adopted a extra conventional analog really feel with devoted dials for the ISO and shutter velocity. It options a big, center-mounted digital viewfinder (EVF) giving it the look of a small SLR. The Sony is the extra modern-looking digicam, with fewer bodily controls an EVF tucked into the left nook. Each cameras may also be managed by way of their touchscreens. We love all of the bodily dials and buttons on the X-T3, however which is the higher structure largely comes down to private choice.

At 1 pound Three ounces, the X-T3 is heavier, however solely by a few ounces. It’s also the bigger digicam at 5.2 x 3.7 x 2.Three inches, in comparison with 4.72 x 2.63 x 2.73 inches for the Sony. A noticeable distinction in these cameras is the dimensions of the grip. Sony has designed a big grip that stands out farther from the physique which isn’t pleasing on the attention, however affords a strong hand maintain and homes a big battery. The X-T3 has a extra delicate grip, but it surely’s nonetheless substantial sufficient to really feel just like the digicam is safe in your hand.

We must also point out that the X-T3 has two card slots, the A6600 solely has one. Whether or not you simply need to maximize storage capability, create redundant backups, or separate nonetheless and video recordsdata, that second card slot can come in useful.

General, the X-T3 feels extra like a digicam, whereas the A6600 seems like a flowery tech gadget. We’re giving the win to the X-T3 right here.

Stabilization

There’s one obtrusive omission from the Fujifilm X-T3: In-body picture stabilization (IBIS). Only one X-series digicam has it, the X-H1, however the X-T sequence is outwardly too small to slot in a gimbaled sensor. Whereas a few of Fujifilm’s XF-mount lenses are optically stabilized, our favourite lenses for the system are the wide-aperture primes — almost all of which aren’t stabilized. This limits how gradual of a shutter velocity you should utilize and not using a tripod.

The Sony A6500 was the primary APS-C mannequin to incorporate sensor-shift stabilization, a function that has been carried ahead into the A6600. It stabilizes movement on 5 axes and affords as much as 5 stops of shake discount, letting you shoot handheld at shutter speeds many instances slower than in any other case potential.

Clearly, Sony takes the win right here.

Video

Sony is understood for video — it makes camcorders {and professional} cinema cameras utilized in Hollywood, in spite of everything — however Fujifilm took an enormous leap ahead with the video capabilities within the X-T3, surpassing Sony in lots of respects. Each cameras shoot 4K, however solely the X-T3 affords each DCI (4,096 x 2,160) and UltraHD (3,840 x 2,160) resolutions (the Sony solely affords UltraHD). It may possibly additionally shoot 4K at 60 frames per second, the place the A6600 tops out at 30.

Moreover, the X-T3 can shoot in-camera 10-bit video with 4:2:Zero coloration at as much as 400 megabits per second, or output uncompressed 10-bit 4:2:2 video over HDMI into an exterior recorder. These are pro-level specs and the picture high quality is spectacular. Sony is proscribed to 8-bit video whether or not recording internally or externally, and tops out at a bitrate of simply 100mbps. Each cameras supply logarithmic coloration profiles for preserving extra dynamic vary, however you may push the X-T3 footage additional due to the extra bit depth.

However with out IBIS, capturing video on the X-T3 all however requires a tripod, gimbal, or different stabilization system. That is the place the A6600 has an actual edge. The significance of IBIS shouldn’t be underestimated, and whereas the X-T3 could supply higher high quality and extra framerates and resolutions that superior videographers crave, the A6600 might be simpler to make use of for the typical individual. Issue Sony’s superb focusing system, and it simply will get higher.

Selecting a winner right here relies on how a lot video shoot and what you want. The X-T3 has extra potential, however informal shooters will seemingly be happier with the A6600.

Different issues to contemplate

Battery life: Fujifilm batteries have put a downer on an in any other case incredible digicam. With the X-T3 you may count on round 360 pictures from a single cost. The A6600 knocks it out the park compared, from which you’ll be able to count on about 830 pictures from a single cost.

Shutter velocity: The X-T3 has a reasonably distinctive benefit right here, albeit one most photographers don’t actually need. It has a shutter velocity vary from 1/8,000 second all the best way all the way down to 15 minutes. You may shoot every thing from sports activities to star trails with out the necessity for a distant timer. The A6600 has a extra conventional vary of 1/4,000 to 30 seconds.

Viewfinder:  The A6600 has a 2.36-million-dot decision and a 0.7X magnification, whereas the X-T3 is each bigger and extra detailed at 3.69 million dots and 0.75X magnification.

LCD Display screen: The LCD display screen on the A6600 flips 180 levels, good for many who are susceptible to taking selfies. The X-T3 LCD display screen solely strikes to 60 levels, however that is nonetheless helpful for many who shoot from the hip or a tripod.

Each screens are touch-sensitive. Nonetheless, you might have extra management with the X-T3, because it permits person to vary focus, settings, and take a shot. The A6600 solely affords the power to vary focus factors when utilizing the contact display screen.

Price: The A6600 will price customers $1,400 (physique solely). The X-T3 physique might be picked up for $1,500, however being a 12 months after its launch, can usually be discovered for much less due to immediate rebates.

Conclusion

Each of those cameras will supply photographers nice outcomes. They’re versatile, well-made, and able to pro-level picture high quality. For sports activities and motion pictures, the Sony A6600 is the best way to go due to its superior autofocus monitoring and vastly superior battery life. However for different disciplines, from landscapes and night time skies to portraits and road pictures, we’d nonetheless go for the Fujifilm X-T3. It’s a workhorse that can serve you effectively for a few years to come back.

Editors’ Suggestions






Shop Amazon