The Canon SELPHY Sq. QX10 is a conveyable wi-fi photograph printer designed to print any images saved in your telephone. Launched in early 2020, it prices round 140 kilos or 150 {dollars}, whereas the small sq. prints work out at about 75p or cents every.

Canon’s clearly aiming squarely – pun totally supposed – at Fujifilm’s INSTAX Sq. format and its SP3 printer specifically, and whereas every gadget makes use of a totally completely different course of, their measurement, operation, print high quality and even costs are remarkably related. The INSTAX SP3 printer prices round 160 kilos or 130 {dollars} in early 2020, whereas the prints work out round 85p or cents every. Since each programs are so related and aimed on the identical market, I’ll be evaluating them carefully on this overview. I’ve filmed a video that compares their options and high quality under, or hold scrolling when you want a written model!



Each are easy gadgets, battery-operated and designed to be managed over Wifi by your telephone or pill. The QX10 sports activities little greater than an influence button, a pair of standing lights and a Micro USB port to cost the interior battery. Each the QX10 and INSTAX SP3 are Wifi-only printers, so you may’t join their USB ports to a pc or digital camera – it’s for charging solely, and there’s no mains choice both. Canon’s battery is sweet for 20 prints per cost versus 160 per cost on the INSTAX SP3, making Fujifilm’s extra appropriate for occasions the place you may be making a number of prints; you can even take away and swap the SP3’s battery if crucial.


Fujifilm went for a extra angular design for the SP3, however when it comes to measurement and weight, it’s similar to the Canon QX10. Whereas each are moveable battery-operated printers although, the Canon prefers to work on a flat floor whereas the Fujifilm is completely satisfied to print mendacity down, standing up, in your fingers or slung over a shoulder on a strap.


The place the 2 printers actually differ although are how they really make their prints. The Canon QX10 makes use of the identical dye sublimation course of as the sooner SELPHY CP-1300 printer – just like that in skilled lab printers  and fortunately a World other than the ZINC course of within the Canon Zoemini fashions. Just like the SELPHY CP-1300, you’ll want to make use of Canon’s personal media particularly designed for that individual mannequin. These include unfastened paper sheets which are loaded into one compartment as much as ten at a time, and a separate ink ribbon on a reel that’s loaded into one other compartment; you may’t use your personal paper or ink and just like the INSTAX SP3, there’s just one print measurement – you may’t load smaller sheets.


In distinction, the Fujifilm SP3 makes use of INSTAX, an instantaneous movie course of the place every sheet of paper already accommodates the chemical substances wanted to develop it. Because the paper begins off as mild delicate, ten at a time are contained in a sealed plastic cartridge that’s loaded in a single go into the again of the printer. It’s the identical course of because the INSTAX cameras. It’s simpler and extra handy to load than the QX10, however there’s extra disposable materials on the finish. In a single profit over the Canon QX10, the INSTAX SP3 signifies what number of prints are remaining utilizing ten LEDs on the entrance.


The QX10 is completely managed by the SELPHY Photograph Structure app which solely runs on iOS or Android gadgets, not Macs or PCs – I used the Android model 2 on my Galaxy S7 for this demo. The Canon app affords simply two choices: to print a single picture or to print two to 4 photos on a single sheet as a collage. The subsequent step is to seek out your photos, however the app reveals all of your telephone’s footage bundled collectively, annoyingly ignoring any separate folders out of your Gallery; as such every thing is combined collectively in a single place, together with images out of your telephone or related cameras, social downloads and screenshots, making it a laborious activity to seek out the picture you’re on the lookout for, until it’s very current.


To be honest, the Fujifilm INSTAX Share app browses your telephone’s images in the very same method, however a minimum of it additionally gives choices for accessing Instagram, Fb, Flickr or Google Photograph accounts. However whereas the INSTAX app is best on this respect, I’d nonetheless like each apps to recognise separate photograph folders in your telephone because it’d make it a lot simpler to navigate; I can’t touch upon whether or not the iOS model does it otherwise. 


When you’ve discovered and chosen your required photograph, you may apply or add quite a lot of results and filters. First-up is the Border choice which helps you to select between three completely different photograph sizes on the paper.


Right here’s the identical photograph printed utilizing every setting. The primary Slim choice produces the most important photograph measurement on the paper, measuring 68x68mm or 2.7×2.7in. In the meantime the smallest choice labelled Large, produces a picture measuring 62x62mm or 2.4×2.4in which in maybe no coincidence matches the precise dimensions and proportions of INSTAX Sq..


In actual fact right here’s one I printed with the SP3 for comparability. So Canon’s providing you with the possibility to both emulate INSTAX Sq. or go for a barely larger photograph measurement when you want.


You can even change the orientation of the picture on the print, though in contrast to the INSTAX app, annoyingly not really transfer the photograph throughout the body, so the sq. crop is at all times taken from the center. Then there’s a number of frames, albeit utilized throughout the photograph not the white border round it, the possibility to overlay textual content or stamps or scribble with a paintbrush, once more within the printable space solely, together with a bunch of filter results. Canon’s additionally leveraged its fourth overcoat go by permitting you to overlay shiny clear results onto the prints, however in observe these come out very faint even when you’re attempting to catch their impact in direct daylight. It’s a pleasant concept however was barely seen in my take a look at.


When you’re able to print, the photograph is distributed out of your telephone to the printer over Wifi and the method begins. Just like the CP-1300 earlier than it, the QX10 passes the paper out and in 4 occasions, as soon as for every ink within the course of: first yellow, then magenta, adopted by cyan after which the print is in full color, and at last an overcoat to seal it. With the paper popping out and in a number of occasions throughout the course of you may see why the printer prefers to be on a flat floor with nothing to hinder it – you must also keep away from dusty environments. The precise printing course of takes about 50 seconds and on the finish you’re left with a print that’s dry and able to go.


Examine this to the INSTAX course of which ejects the paper after solely about 20 seconds. You’re now free handy the print to somebody, begin printing one other, or pack up, however the precise picture itself received’t totally seem till a few minutes later, regularly fading into existence. There’s one thing enjoyable about seeing this in motion and I additionally like that the printer itself is simply occupied for about 20 seconds, however conversely the Canon course of will ship a completed photograph in lower than half the time.


However which produces the better-looking images? I made prints of the identical images utilizing every gadget for comparability, utilizing the Canon’s thickest border choice to match the INSTAX measurement. I’ve put the Canon QX10 prints on the left and INSTAX SP3 prints on the appropriate.


By way of element they’re each primarily the identical. By way of color stability, the INSTAX course of has gone for a barely hotter method than the Canon with colors which are barely extra genuine to the unique photos in some examples, however method off in others – the selection on this regard is a private choice.


Constantly the largest distinction in photograph model although is the upper distinction of the INSTAX prints which look punchier because of this, albeit on the occasional value of crushed blacks and burnt-out highlights.


With decrease distinction, the Canon prints retain extra tonal element, however once more the selection is a private one. Bodily, the INSTAX prints are thicker and shinier, however extra liable to reflections, whereas Canon’s usefully characteristic a peel-off sticky again, albeit solely mildly adhesive – you’ll must complement it for a powerful maintain.


For longevity, each corporations quote bold lifespans, so let’s reconvene in a couple of years and examine notes.

Canon SELPHY QX10 verdict

Finally the SELPHY Sq. QX10 is Canon’s finest moveable wi-fi printer to this point, inheriting the lab-quality tech of the CP-1300, however re-packaging it in a smaller, battery-operated unit that’s solely designed to make enjoyable sq. prints from photos saved in your telephone – and bear in mind these may very well be images taken with a standard digital camera, like all of these I’ve proven you right here.


The prints look nearly similar to Fujifilm’s in style INSTAX Sq. format, with the extra advantages of sticky backs and a barely cheaper value on the time I made this overview. Fujifilm’s INSTAX SP3 moveable printer is better-suited to occasions and informal use although, with longer battery life, the flexibility to work in any place, and with prints which will take longer to develop however that bodily emerge sooner, permitting you to extra shortly hand them out and transfer onto your subsequent topic. Fujifilm’s printing app additionally consists of choices to overlay native data or entry on-line images, whereas Canon’s app is presently restricted to images bodily saved in your telephone, though each apps might do with simpler photograph navigation a minimum of on the Android variations I examined. It’s arduous to select a winner total and I really feel the choice will largely boil right down to which gadget and media works out cheaper on the time of buy. Both method, I like the sq. format of each programs and it’s nice to now have some severe competitors for INSTAX.

Examine costs on the SELPHY QX10 at Amazon, B&H, Adorama or Wex. Alternatively get your self a duplicate of my In Digicam ebook or deal with me to a espresso! Thanks!

Shop Amazon